Sempron 2800+ vs Celeron M 575
Aggregate performance score
Celeron M 575 outperforms Sempron 2800+ by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 575 and Sempron 2800+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3150 | 3297 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.76 | 0.23 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Manila (2001−2006) |
| Release date | 1 June 2008 (16 years ago) | January 2001 (23 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $104 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 575 and Sempron 2800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 256K |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 144 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 81 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 575 and Sempron 2800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 62 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.25 | 0.15 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 62 Watt |
Celeron M 575 has a 66.7% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.
The Celeron M 575 is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 2800+ in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron M 575 is a notebook processor while Sempron 2800+ is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 575 and Sempron 2800+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
