Sempron 3200+ vs Celeron M 570
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 570 and Sempron 3200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 3288 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.24 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Palermo (2001−2005) |
| Release date | 30 April 2008 (16 years ago) | 1 October 2005 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $13 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 570 and Sempron 3200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.26 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 103 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 63 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 570 and Sempron 3200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | 939 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 62 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 570 and Sempron 3200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 April 2008 | 1 October 2005 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 62 Watt |
Celeron M 570 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 106.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 570 and Sempron 3200+. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 570 is a notebook processor while Sempron 3200+ is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 570 and Sempron 3200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
