Core 2 Duo T5450 vs Celeron M 560

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 560
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 30 Watt
0.34
Core 2 Duo T5450
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.37
+8.8%

Core 2 Duo T5450 outperforms Celeron M 560 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 560 and Core 2 Duo T5450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30783046
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MCore 2 Duo
Power efficiency1.071.03
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Merom-2048 (2006−2008)
Release date1 May 2008 (16 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 560 and Core 2 Duo T5450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz1.66 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz667 MHz
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cacheno data2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.075V-1.25V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 560 and Core 2 Duo T5450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 560 and Core 2 Duo T5450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Celeron M 560 and Core 2 Duo T5450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 560 and Core 2 Duo T5450 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 560 0.34
Core 2 Duo T5450 0.37
+8.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 560 535
Core 2 Duo T5450 583
+9%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron M 560 2008
+20.5%
Core 2 Duo T5450 1666

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron M 560 2008
Core 2 Duo T5450 3122
+55.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 0.37
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron M 560 has 16.7% lower power consumption.

Core 2 Duo T5450, on the other hand, has a 8.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron M 560 and Core 2 Duo T5450.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 560 and Core 2 Duo T5450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 560
Celeron M 560
Intel Core 2 Duo T5450
Core 2 Duo T5450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 43 votes

Rate Celeron M 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 48 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T5450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 560 or Core 2 Duo T5450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.