Ryzen 7 7800X vs Celeron M 530

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 530 and Ryzen 7 7800X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCeleron MAMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Zen 4
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 530 and Ryzen 7 7800X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speed1.73 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.73 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cacheno data8 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache96 MB
Chip lithography65 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data71+122 mm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.95V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 530 and Ryzen 7 7800X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPBGA479,PPGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 530 and Ryzen 7 7800X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 530 and Ryzen 7 7800X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 530 and Ryzen 7 7800X are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 530 and Ryzen 7 7800X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 120 Watt

Celeron M 530 has 300% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 7800X, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 530 and Ryzen 7 7800X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 530 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 7800X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 530 and Ryzen 7 7800X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 530
Celeron M 530
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X
Ryzen 7 7800X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 40 votes

Rate Celeron M 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 111 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 530 or Ryzen 7 7800X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.