Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 vs Celeron M 520
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 520 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Celeron M | no data |
Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Griffin (2008−2009) |
Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | December 2008 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 520 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
L2 cache | no data | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 0.95V-1.3V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 520 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | PPGA478 | S1 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 520 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
PowerNow | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | - | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 520 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 520 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-x | - | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 35 Watt |
Celeron M 520 has 16.7% lower power consumption.
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 520 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 520 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.