i3-8000 vs Celeron M 520

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 520 and Core i3-8000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCeleron MIntel Core i3
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)1 September 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 520 and Core i3-8000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate533 MHz4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data36
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data126 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.95V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 520 and Core i3-8000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPPGA4781151
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 520 and Core i3-8000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 520 and Core i3-8000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 520 and Core i3-8000 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 520 and Core i3-8000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 630

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 520 and Core i3-8000.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron M 520 has 116.7% lower power consumption.

i3-8000, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 520 and Core i3-8000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 520 is a notebook processor while Core i3-8000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 520 and Core i3-8000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 520
Celeron M 520
Intel Core i3-8000
Core i3-8000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 49 votes

Rate Celeron M 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 5 votes

Rate Core i3-8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 520 or Core i3-8000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.