Celeron 897 vs M 520

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 520 and Celeron 897 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	3304	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Celeron M	Intel Celeron
Power efficiency	0.47	no data
Architecture codename	Merom (2006−2008)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date	no data (2024 years ago)	no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 520 and Celeron 897 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	1	2
Base clock speed	1.6 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1.6 GHz	1.6 GHz
Bus type	no data	DMI 2.0
Bus rate	533 MHz	4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier	no data	16
L1 cache	no data	128 KB
L2 cache	no data	512 KB
L3 cache	1 MB L2 Cache	2 MB
Chip lithography	65 nm	32 nm
Die size	no data	131 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	504 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	0.95V-1.3V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 520 and Celeron 897 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	PPGA478	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 520 and Celeron 897. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 520 and Celeron 897 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 520 and Celeron 897 are enumerated here.

VT-x

-

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 520 and Celeron 897. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	no data	DDR3-1333
Maximum memory size	no data	16 GB
Max memory channels	no data	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Pros & cons summary

---

Physical cores	1	2
Threads	1	2
Chip lithography	65 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	17 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 520 and Celeron 897, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---