Xeon E5-4667 v4 vs Celeron M 430

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 430 and Xeon E5-4667 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated591
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.22
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCeleron MIntel Xeon E5
Power efficiencyno data8.97
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,729

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 430 and Xeon E5-4667 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads136
Base clock speed1.73 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.73 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rate533 MHz2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplierno data22
L2 cacheno data4.5 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB45 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data456.12 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C87 °C
Number of transistorsno data7200 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.0V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 430 and Xeon E5-4667 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data4 (Multiprocessor)
SocketPPGA478FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 430 and Xeon E5-4667 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bit46 Bit
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 430 and Xeon E5-4667 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 430 and Xeon E5-4667 v4 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 430 and Xeon E5-4667 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data1.5 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 430 and Xeon E5-4667 v4.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 430 169
Xeon E5-4667 v4 20319
+11923%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 18
Threads 1 36
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 135 Watt

Celeron M 430 has 400% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-4667 v4, on the other hand, has 1700% more physical cores and 3500% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 430 and Xeon E5-4667 v4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 430 is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-4667 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 430 and Xeon E5-4667 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 430
Celeron M 430
Intel Xeon E5-4667 v4
Xeon E5-4667 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 25 votes

Rate Celeron M 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 57 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4667 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 430 or Xeon E5-4667 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.