Celeron M 333 vs M 420

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 420 and Celeron M 333 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3393not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MCeleron M
Power efficiency0.32no data
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Banias (2003)
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 420 and Celeron M 333 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz0.9 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz400 MHz
L3 cache1 MB L2 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm130 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.0V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 420 and Celeron M 333 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 420 and Celeron M 333. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 420 and Celeron M 333 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 420 and Celeron M 333 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 5 Watt

Celeron M 420 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 333, on the other hand, has 440% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 420 and Celeron M 333. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 420 and Celeron M 333, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 420
Celeron M 420
Intel Celeron M 333
Celeron M 333

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 81 vote

Rate Celeron M 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 333 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 420 or Celeron M 333, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.