Ryzen 7 3800X vs Celeron M 410

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 410 and Ryzen 7 3800X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	3386	487
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	15.87
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Celeron M	AMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency	0.28	13.13
Architecture codename	Yonah (2005−2006)	Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date	no data (2024 years ago)	7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 410 and Ryzen 7 3800X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	1	16
Base clock speed	1.46 GHz	3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.46 GHz	4.5 GHz
Bus rate	533 MHz	no data
L1 cache	no data	96K (per core)
L2 cache	no data	512K (per core)
L3 cache	1 MB L2 KB	32 MB
Chip lithography	65 nm	7 nm, 12 nm
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	19,200 million
64 bit support	-	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	-	+
VID voltage range	1.0V-1.3V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 410 and Ryzen 7 3800X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	PPGA478	AM4
Power consumption (TDP)	27 Watt	105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 410 and Ryzen 7 3800X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	32 Bit	no data
FSB parity	-	no data
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Security technologies

Celeron M 410 and Ryzen 7 3800X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 410 and Ryzen 7 3800X are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-x	-	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 410 and Ryzen 7 3800X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	no data	DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size	no data	128 GB
Max memory channels	no data	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	51.196 GB/s

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.08	14.57
Physical cores	1	8
Threads	1	16
Chip lithography	65 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	27 Watt	105 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 410 and Ryzen 7 3800X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---