FX-8100 vs Celeron M 410

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 410 and FX-8100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	1733
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Celeron M	no data
Power efficiency	no data	2.54
Architecture codename	Yonah (2005−2006)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date	no data (2024 years ago)	12 October 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 410 and FX-8100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	1	8
Base clock speed	1.46 GHz	2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.46 GHz	3.7 GHz
Bus rate	533 MHz	no data
L1 cache	no data	384 KB
L2 cache	no data	8 MB
L3 cache	1 MB L2 KB	8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	65 nm	32 nm
Die size	no data	315 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	1,200 million
64 bit support	-	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	-	+
VID voltage range	1.0V-1.3V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 410 and FX-8100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	PPGA478	AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)	27 Watt	95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 410 and FX-8100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	+
FMA	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	32 Bit	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 410 and FX-8100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 410 and FX-8100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-x	-	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 410 and FX-8100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

no data

DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 410 and FX-8100.

PCIe version

no data

2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Physical cores	1	8
Threads	1	8
Chip lithography	65 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	27 Watt	95 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 410 and FX-8100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---