Atom N475 vs Celeron M 410

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 410 and Atom N475 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Celeron M	Intel Atom
Architecture codename	Yonah (2005−2006)	Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date	no data (2024 years ago)	1 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$75

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 410 and Atom N475 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	1	2
Base clock speed	1.46 GHz	1.83 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.46 GHz	1.83 GHz
Bus rate	533 MHz	533 MHz
L1 cache	no data	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	no data	512K (per core)
L3 cache	1 MB L2 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	65 nm	45 nm
Die size	no data	66 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	100 °C
Number of transistors	no data	123 million
64 bit support	-	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	1.0V-1.3V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 410 and Atom N475 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	PPGA478	FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)	27 Watt	6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 410 and Atom N475. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	+
Idle States	-	no data
Thermal Monitoring	-	+
Demand Based Switching	-	-
PAE	32 Bit	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 410 and Atom N475 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	-
EDB	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 410 and Atom N475 are enumerated here.

VT-d	no data	-
VT-x	-	-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 410 and Atom N475. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	no data	DDR3
Maximum memory size	no data	2 GB
Max memory channels	no data	1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Intel GMA 3150

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Threads	1	2
Chip lithography	65 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	27 Watt	6 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 410 and Atom N475, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---