Athlon X2 QL-67 vs Celeron M 380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 380 and Athlon X2 QL-67 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron M2x AMD Athlon
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Lion (2008−2009)
Release dateno data1 September 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 380 and Athlon X2 QL-67 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate400 MHz4000 MHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.004V-1.292Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 380 and Athlon X2 QL-67 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 380 and Athlon X2 QL-67. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron M 380 and Athlon X2 QL-67 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 380 and Athlon X2 QL-67 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron M 380 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

Athlon X2 QL-67, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 380 and Athlon X2 QL-67. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 380 and Athlon X2 QL-67, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 380
Celeron M 380
AMD Athlon X2 QL-67
Athlon X2 QL-67

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Celeron M 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon X2 QL-67 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 380 or Athlon X2 QL-67, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.