Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Celeron M 360

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 360
1 core / 1 thread, 21 Watt
0.14
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
39.35
+28007%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Celeron M 360 by a whopping 28007% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 360 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking333468
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data56.78
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCeleron MAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency0.6331.01
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
Release dateno data4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 360 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads132
Base clock speed1.4 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rate400 MHz64K (per core)
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C89 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistorsno data13,140 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1.26V, 1.004V-1.292Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 360 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479AM5
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 360 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron M 360 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 360 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 360 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-5200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 360 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 360 0.14
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 39.35
+28007%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 360 221
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 62510
+28185%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron M 360 131
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 2.01
+6417%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.14 39.35
Physical cores 1 16
Threads 1 32
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 120 Watt

Celeron M 360 has 471.4% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D, on the other hand, has a 28007.1% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 360 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron M 360 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 7950X3D is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 360 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 360
Celeron M 360
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 12 votes

Rate Celeron M 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1440 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7950X3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 360 or Ryzen 9 7950X3D, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.