Ryzen 5 2600 vs Celeron M 353
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 353 and Ryzen 5 2600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 905 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 22 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 9.91 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Celeron M | AMD Ryzen 5 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 12.08 |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 19 April 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $199 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 353 and Ryzen 5 2600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.9 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 34 |
| L1 cache | no data | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | no data | 192 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 353 and Ryzen 5 2600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 353 and Ryzen 5 2600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 353 and Ryzen 5 2600 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 353 and Ryzen 5 2600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 46.933 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 353 and Ryzen 5 2600.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron M 353 has 1200% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 2600, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 353 and Ryzen 5 2600. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 353 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 353 and Ryzen 5 2600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
