Celeron M 350 vs M 340

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 340 and Celeron M 350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3330not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MCeleron M
Power efficiency0.63no data
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 340 and Celeron M 350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rate400 MHz400 MHz
L3 cache512 KB L21 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography130 nm90 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.356V1.26V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 340 and Celeron M 350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478PPGA478, H-PBGA479, H-PBGA478, PPGA479
Power consumption (TDP)24.5 Watt21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 340 and Celeron M 350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)--
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States--
Demand Based Switching--
PAE32 Bit32 Bit
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Celeron M 340 and Celeron M 350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 340 and Celeron M 350 are enumerated here.

VT-x--

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 21 Watt

Celeron M 350 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 14.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 340 and Celeron M 350. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 340 and Celeron M 350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 340
Celeron M 340
Intel Celeron M 350
Celeron M 350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate Celeron M 340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate Celeron M 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 340 or Celeron M 350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.