A8-5545M vs Celeron M 340

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 340
1 core / 1 thread, 24 Watt
0.14
A8-5545M
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
0.98
+600%

A8-5545M outperforms Celeron M 340 by a whopping 600% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 340 and A8-5545M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33302483
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MAMD A-Series
Power efficiency0.633.71
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)Richland (2013−2014)
Release dateno data1 June 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 340 and A8-5545M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache512 KB L20 KB
Chip lithography130 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 340 and A8-5545M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478FP2
Power consumption (TDP)24.5 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 340 and A8-5545M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 340 and A8-5545M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 340 and A8-5545M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 340 and A8-5545M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8510G (450 - 554 MHz)

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.14 0.98
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 130 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 25 Watt

Celeron M 340 has 4.2% lower power consumption.

A8-5545M, on the other hand, has a 600% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

The A8-5545M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 340 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 340 and A8-5545M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 340
Celeron M 340
AMD A8-5545M
A8-5545M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate Celeron M 340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 24 votes

Rate A8-5545M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 340 or A8-5545M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.