Celeron N3000 vs M 330

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 330 and Celeron N3000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)Braswell (2015−2016)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)1 April 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 330 and Celeron N3000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.4 GHz1.04 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz2.08 GHz
Bus typeno dataIDI
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache512 KB L20 KB
Chip lithography130 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 330 and Celeron N3000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPPGA478FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)24.5 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 330 and Celeron N3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
FSB parity-no data
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Celeron M 330 and Celeron N3000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB-+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 330 and Celeron N3000 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x-+
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 330 and Celeron N3000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Intel® Celeron® Processor N3000 Series
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data600 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 330 and Celeron N3000 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron M 330 and Celeron N3000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 330 and Celeron N3000.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 4 Watt

Celeron N3000 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 330 and Celeron N3000. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 330 and Celeron N3000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 330
Celeron M 330
Intel Celeron N3000
Celeron N3000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate Celeron M 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 22 votes

Rate Celeron N3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 330 or Celeron N3000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.