FX-4300 vs Celeron J4125

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4125
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.87
FX-4300
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.88
+0.5%

FX-4300 outperforms Celeron J4125 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4125 and FX-4300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19821971
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.360.26
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency17.621.86
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron J4125 has 1962% better value for money than FX-4300.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4125 and FX-4300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache56 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache4 MB (shared)4096 KB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size93 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C71 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.225 V - Max: 1.3875 V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4125 and FX-4300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4125 and FX-4300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J4125 and FX-4300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4125 and FX-4300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4125 and FX-4300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4125 and FX-4300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4125 and FX-4300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4125 and FX-4300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4125 and FX-4300.

PCIe version2.0n/a
PCI Express lanes6no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4125 1.87
FX-4300 1.88
+0.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4125 2957
FX-4300 2983
+0.9%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J4125 346
FX-4300 454
+31.2%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J4125 962
FX-4300 1104
+14.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.87 1.88
Recency 4 November 2019 23 October 2012
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 95 Watt

Celeron J4125 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 850% lower power consumption.

FX-4300, on the other hand, has a 0.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron J4125 and FX-4300.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4125 and FX-4300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4125
Celeron J4125
AMD FX-4300
FX-4300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1509 votes

Rate Celeron J4125 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1724 votes

Rate FX-4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4125 or FX-4300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.