EPYC 7272 vs Celeron J4125

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4125
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.93
EPYC 7272
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
16.44
+752%

EPYC 7272 outperforms Celeron J4125 by a whopping 752% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4125 and EPYC 7272 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1979421
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.3711.78
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency17.6012.49
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$625

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7272 has 119% better value for money than Celeron J4125.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4125 and EPYC 7272 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed2 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplierno data29
L1 cache56 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size93 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4125 and EPYC 7272 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1090SP3
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4125 and EPYC 7272. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron J4125 and EPYC 7272 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4125 and EPYC 7272 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4125 and EPYC 7272. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600N/A
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4125 and EPYC 7272 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4125 and EPYC 7272 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4125 and EPYC 7272 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4125 and EPYC 7272.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes6128
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4125 1.93
EPYC 7272 16.44
+752%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4125 2957
EPYC 7272 25161
+751%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.93 16.44
Recency 4 November 2019 7 August 2019
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 120 Watt

Celeron J4125 has an age advantage of 2 months, and 1100% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7272, on the other hand, has a 751.8% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7272 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4125 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4125 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7272 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4125 and EPYC 7272, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4125
Celeron J4125
AMD EPYC 7272
EPYC 7272

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1509 votes

Rate Celeron J4125 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 21 vote

Rate EPYC 7272 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4125 or EPYC 7272, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.