Atom C3808 vs Celeron J4125

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4125 and Atom C3808 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1982not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.36no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency17.65no data
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$369

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4125 and Atom C3808 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2 GHz
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache56 KB (per core)672 KB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)12 MB
L3 cache4 MB12 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size93 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C86 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4125 and Atom C3808 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1090FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4125 and Atom C3808. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J4125 and Atom C3808 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4125 and Atom C3808 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4125 and Atom C3808. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4: 2133
Maximum memory size8 GB256 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4125 and Atom C3808 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4125 and Atom C3808 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4125 and Atom C3808 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4125 and Atom C3808.

PCIe version2.03
PCI Express lanes616
USB revision2.0/3.03
Total number of SATA ports216
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports216
Number of USB ports88
Integrated LAN-4x10/2.5/1 GBE
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 November 2019 15 August 2017
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 12
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 25 Watt

Celeron J4125 has an age advantage of 2 years, and 150% lower power consumption.

Atom C3808, on the other hand, has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J4125 and Atom C3808. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron J4125 is a desktop processor while Atom C3808 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4125 and Atom C3808, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4125
Celeron J4125
Intel Atom C3808
Atom C3808

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1509 votes

Rate Celeron J4125 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3808 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4125 or Atom C3808, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.