Ryzen 5 7520U vs Celeron J4115

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4115
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.69
Ryzen 5 7520U
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
5.79
+243%

Ryzen 5 7520U outperforms Celeron J4115 by a whopping 243% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4115 and Ryzen 5 7520U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20471116
Place by popularitynot in top-10027
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiency15.9936.53
Architecture codenameGemini Lake (2019)Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4115 and Ryzen 5 7520U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data100 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4115 and Ryzen 5 7520U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090FP6
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4115 and Ryzen 5 7520U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J4115 and Ryzen 5 7520U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4115 and Ryzen 5 7520U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4115 and Ryzen 5 7520U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600AMD Radeon 610M
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4115 and Ryzen 5 7520U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4115 and Ryzen 5 7520U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4115 and Ryzen 5 7520U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4115 and Ryzen 5 7520U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes64
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4115 1.69
Ryzen 5 7520U 5.79
+243%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4115 2687
Ryzen 5 7520U 9194
+242%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron J4115 244
Ryzen 5 7520U 834
+242%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron J4115 71
Ryzen 5 7520U 169
+139%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron J4115 1421
Ryzen 5 7520U 3821
+169%

Blender(-)

Celeron J4115 2515
+328%
Ryzen 5 7520U 588

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Celeron J4115 399
Ryzen 5 7520U 1066
+167%

7-Zip Single

Celeron J4115 2200
Ryzen 5 7520U 4167
+89.5%

7-Zip

Celeron J4115 7614
Ryzen 5 7520U 24219
+218%

WebXPRT 3

Celeron J4115 82
Ryzen 5 7520U 191
+134%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.69 5.79
Integrated graphics card 0.87 2.85
Recency 4 November 2019 20 September 2022
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron J4115 has 50% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 7520U, on the other hand, has a 242.6% higher aggregate performance score, 227.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 7520U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4115 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4115 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 7520U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4115 and Ryzen 5 7520U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4115
Celeron J4115
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
Ryzen 5 7520U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 135 votes

Rate Celeron J4115 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1403 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7520U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4115 or Ryzen 5 7520U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.