m3-7Y32 vs Celeron J4115

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4115
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.76

Core m3-7Y32 outperforms Celeron J4115 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4115 and Core m3-7Y32 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20442031
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Core m3
Power efficiency16.0536.27
Architecture codenameGemini Lake (2019)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)21 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$281

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4115 and Core m3-7Y32 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeno dataOPI
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
Multiplierno data11
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache4 MB512 KB
L3 cache4 MB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4115 and Core m3-7Y32 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1090FCBGA1515
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4115 and Core m3-7Y32. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Response-+
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J4115 and Core m3-7Y32 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4115 and Core m3-7Y32 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4115 and Core m3-7Y32. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data29.861 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600Intel HD Graphics 615
Max video memory8 GB16 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency750 MHz900 MHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4115 and Core m3-7Y32 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVIno data+
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4115 and Core m3-7Y32 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data3840x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4115 and Core m3-7Y32 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.44.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4115 and Core m3-7Y32.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes610
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4115 1.76
m3-7Y32 1.79
+1.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4115 2687
m3-7Y32 2733
+1.7%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron J4115 244
m3-7Y32 265
+8.6%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron J4115 71
m3-7Y32 120
+70%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron J4115 1421
m3-7Y32 1576
+10.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.76 1.79
Integrated graphics card 0.87 1.87
Recency 4 November 2019 21 April 2017
Physical cores 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 4 Watt

Celeron J4115 has an age advantage of 2 years, and 100% more physical cores.

m3-7Y32, on the other hand, has a 1.7% higher aggregate performance score, 114.9% faster integrated GPU, and 150% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron J4115 and Core m3-7Y32.

Note that Celeron J4115 is a desktop processor while Core m3-7Y32 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4115 and Core m3-7Y32, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4115
Celeron J4115
Intel Core m3-7Y32
Core m3-7Y32

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 134 votes

Rate Celeron J4115 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 22 votes

Rate Core m3-7Y32 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4115 or Core m3-7Y32, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.