Ryzen 7 2700X vs Celeron J4105

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4105
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.83
Ryzen 7 2700X
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
11.02
+502%

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Celeron J4105 by a whopping 502% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 7 2700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2010709
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.099.32
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency17.329.93
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date11 December 2017 (7 years ago)13 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 2700X has 346% better value for money than Celeron J4105.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 7 2700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier1537
L1 cache256 KB768 KB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB
L3 cache4 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size93 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 7 2700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1090AM4
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 7 2700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 7 2700X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 7 2700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 7 2700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600-
Max video memory8 GB-
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHz-
Execution Units12-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 7 2700X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 7 2700X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 7 2700X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12-
OpenGL4.4-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 7 2700X.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes620
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4105 1.83
Ryzen 7 2700X 11.02
+502%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4105 2899
Ryzen 7 2700X 17509
+504%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J4105 325
Ryzen 7 2700X 1253
+286%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J4105 922
Ryzen 7 2700X 6118
+564%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron J4105 270
Ryzen 7 2700X 1762
+553%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron J4105 73
Ryzen 7 2700X 176
+141%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.83 11.02
Recency 11 December 2017 13 April 2018
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 105 Watt

Celeron J4105 has 950% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 2700X, on the other hand, has a 502.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 2700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4105 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 7 2700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4105
Celeron J4105
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 7 2700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 311 votes

Rate Celeron J4105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2963 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4105 or Ryzen 7 2700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.