i5-6442EQ vs Celeron J4105

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4105
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.86
Core i5-6442EQ
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
2.88
+54.8%

Core i5-6442EQ outperforms Celeron J4105 by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4105 and Core i5-6442EQ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19941668
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.070.33
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core i5
Power efficiency17.2810.70
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)12 October 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$250

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron J4105 has 527% better value for money than i5-6442EQ.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4105 and Core i5-6442EQ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier1519
L1 cache256 KB256 KB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)1 MB
L3 cache4 MB6 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size93 mm2122 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4105 and Core i5-6442EQ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1090no data
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4105 and Core i5-6442EQ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J4105 and Core i5-6442EQ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4105 and Core i5-6442EQ are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4105 and Core i5-6442EQ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size8 GB64 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s34.134 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600Intel HD Graphics 530
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4105 and Core i5-6442EQ integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4105 and Core i5-6442EQ integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4105 and Core i5-6442EQ integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4105 and Core i5-6442EQ.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes616
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4105 1.86
i5-6442EQ 2.88
+54.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4105 2905
i5-6442EQ 4487
+54.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.86 2.88
Integrated graphics card 0.87 2.59
Recency 11 December 2017 12 October 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 25 Watt

Celeron J4105 has an age advantage of 2 years, and 150% lower power consumption.

i5-6442EQ, on the other hand, has a 54.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 197.7% faster integrated GPU.

The Core i5-6442EQ is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4105 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4105 is a desktop processor while Core i5-6442EQ is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4105 and Core i5-6442EQ, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4105
Celeron J4105
Intel Core i5-6442EQ
Core i5-6442EQ

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 302 votes

Rate Celeron J4105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i5-6442EQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4105 or Core i5-6442EQ, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.