Celeron N4000 vs J4105

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4105
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.83
+96.8%
Celeron N4000
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.93

Celeron J4105 outperforms Celeron N4000 by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4105 and Celeron N4000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19962513
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.11no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Power efficiency17.3214.67
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)Goldmont Plus (2017)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)11 December 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4105 and Celeron N4000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Multiplier1511
L1 cache56 KB (per core)112 KB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB
L3 cache4 MB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size93 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 deg C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4105 and Celeron N4000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1090FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron N4000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift--
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response--
GPIO++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--

Security technologies

Celeron J4105 and Celeron N4000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron N4000 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron N4000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600Intel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memory8 GB8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency750 MHz650 MHz
Execution Units1212

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4105 and Celeron N4000 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron N4000 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron N4000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.44.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron N4000.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes66
USB revision2.0/3.02.0/3.0
Total number of SATA ports22
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports22
Number of USB ports88
Integrated LAN--
UART++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4105 1.83
+96.8%
Celeron N4000 0.93

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4105 2903
+97.2%
Celeron N4000 1472

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J4105 325
+0.3%
Celeron N4000 324

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J4105 923
+74.8%
Celeron N4000 528

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron J4105 270
+95.7%
Celeron N4000 138

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron J4105 73
+3%
Celeron N4000 71

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.83 0.93
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron J4105 has a 96.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron N4000, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron J4105 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4000 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4105 is a desktop processor while Celeron N4000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4105 and Celeron N4000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4105
Celeron J4105
Intel Celeron N4000
Celeron N4000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 303 votes

Rate Celeron J4105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 913 votes

Rate Celeron N4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4105 or Celeron N4000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.