i3-7120T vs Celeron J4025
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J4025 and Core i3-7120T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2529 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.64 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i3 |
| Power efficiency | 8.76 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 4 November 2019 (5 years ago) | 17 July 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $117 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron J4025 and Core i3-7120T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 35 |
| L1 cache | 56 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 3 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 93 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 65 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J4025 and Core i3-7120T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1090 | 1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and Core i3-7120T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and Core i3-7120T are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and Core i3-7120T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz) | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and Core i3-7120T.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 0.87 | 3.11 |
| Recency | 4 November 2019 | 17 July 2017 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Celeron J4025 has an age advantage of 2 years, and 250% lower power consumption.
i3-7120T, on the other hand, has 257.5% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Celeron J4025 and Core i3-7120T. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and Core i3-7120T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
