Atom CE4100 vs Celeron J4025
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J4025 and Atom CE4100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2532 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.63 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 8.77 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) | Sodaville (2009) |
| Release date | 4 November 2019 (5 years ago) | 24 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron J4025 and Atom CE4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 56 KB (per core) | 56 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 93 mm2 | 96 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 47 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J4025 and Atom CE4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1090 | Intel BGA 951 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 7 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and Atom CE4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and Atom CE4100 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and Atom CE4100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz) | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and Atom CE4100.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 November 2019 | 24 September 2009 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 7 Watt |
Celeron J4025 has an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
Atom CE4100, on the other hand, has 42.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron J4025 and Atom CE4100. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron J4025 is a desktop processor while Atom CE4100 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and Atom CE4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
