EPYC 9654 vs Celeron J3455E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J3455E
2019
4 threads, 10 Watt
1.38
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
75.73
+5388%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Celeron J3455E by a whopping 5388% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3455E and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22186
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.29
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency13.0619.91
Architecture codenameno dataGenoa (2022−2023)
Release date1 July 2019 (5 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3455E and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data96
Threads4192
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplierno data24
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3455E and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3455E and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron J3455E and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3455E and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3455E and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/sDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size8 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3455E and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3455E and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3455E and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes6128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J3455E 1.38
EPYC 9654 75.73
+5388%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J3455E 2193
EPYC 9654 120295
+5385%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J3455E 269
EPYC 9654 1837
+583%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J3455E 796
EPYC 9654 18836
+2266%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.38 75.73
Recency 1 July 2019 10 November 2022
Threads 4 192
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 360 Watt

Celeron J3455E has 3500% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654, on the other hand, has a 5387.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 4700% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3455E in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J3455E is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3455E and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3455E
Celeron J3455E
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate Celeron J3455E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 992 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3455E or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.