Celeron N5095 vs J3455E

Place in the ranking	2220	1730
Place by popularity	not in top-100	30
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Series	no data	Intel Jasper Lake
Power efficiency	13.06	16.21
Architecture codename	no data	Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date	1 July 2019 (5 years ago)	11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3455E and Celeron N5095 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	no data	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	1.5 GHz	2 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.3 GHz	2.9 GHz
L2 cache	no data	1.5 MB
L3 cache	2 MB	4 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	105 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3455E and Celeron N5095 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	no data	FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3455E and Celeron N5095. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI	+	+
vPro	no data	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Speed Shift	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	-
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	+
Smart Response	-	-
GPIO	no data	+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	no data	-

Security technologies

Celeron J3455E and Celeron N5095 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	-
EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
Identity Protection	+	+
SGX	no data	-
OS Guard	no data	+
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3455E and Celeron N5095 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
VT-i	-	no data
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3455E and Celeron N5095. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s	DDR4
Maximum memory size	8 GB	16 GB
Max memory channels	2	2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics 500	Intel UHD Graphics
Max video memory	8 GB	no data
Quick Sync Video	+	+
Clear Video	+	no data
Clear Video HD	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	750 MHz	750 MHz
Execution Units	12	16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3455E and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	3	3
eDP	+	+
DisplayPort	+	+
HDMI	+	+
MIPI-DSI	+	+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J3455E and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support	no data	+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4	no data	4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP	no data	4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort	no data	4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3455E and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	+	12
OpenGL	+	4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3455E and Celeron N5095.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	6	8
USB revision	no data	2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports	no data	2
Number of USB ports	no data	14
Integrated LAN	no data	-
UART	no data	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J3455E 1.38

Celeron N5095 2.57
+86.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J3455E 2193

Celeron N5095 4078
+86%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.38	2.57
Integrated graphics card	0.77	5.58
Recency	1 July 2019	11 January 2021
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	15 Watt

Celeron J3455E has 50% lower power consumption.

Celeron N5095, on the other hand, has a 86.2% higher aggregate performance score, 624.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron N5095 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3455E in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3455E and Celeron N5095, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.