Processor N50 vs Celeron J3455

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J3455
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.42
Processor N50
2023
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.74
+22.5%

Processor N50 outperforms Celeron J3455 by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3455 and Processor N50 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22052038
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.22no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency13.4427.44
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3455 and Processor N50 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier15no data
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3455 and Processor N50 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1296Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3455 and Processor N50. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J3455 and Processor N50 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3455 and Processor N50 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3455 and Processor N50. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/sDDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 500Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 750 MHz)
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3455 and Processor N50 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3455 and Processor N50 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3455 and Processor N50.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes69
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.42 1.74
Integrated graphics card 0.77 2.30
Recency 30 August 2016 3 January 2023
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron J3455 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Processor N50, on the other hand, has a 22.5% higher aggregate performance score, 198.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Processor N50 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3455 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J3455 is a desktop processor while Processor N50 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3455 and Processor N50, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3455
Celeron J3455
Intel Processor N50
Processor N50

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 229 votes

Rate Celeron J3455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 6 votes

Rate Processor N50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3455 or Processor N50, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.