Celeron J4025 vs J3455

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J3455
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.42
+52.7%
Celeron J4025
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.93

Celeron J3455 outperforms Celeron J4025 by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3455 and Celeron J4025 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22052526
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.222.67
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency13.448.80
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)4 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron J4025 has 1114% better value for money than Celeron J3455.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3455 and Celeron J4025 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier15no data
L1 cacheno data56 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB4 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data93 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3455 and Celeron J4025 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1296Intel BGA 1090
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3455 and Celeron J4025. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J3455 and Celeron J4025 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3455 and Celeron J4025 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3455 and Celeron J4025. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/sDDR4
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 500Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3455 and Celeron J4025 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3455 and Celeron J4025 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3455 and Celeron J4025.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes66
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J3455 1.42
+52.7%
Celeron J4025 0.93

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J3455 2253
+52.5%
Celeron J4025 1477

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J3455 256
Celeron J4025 329
+28.5%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J3455 768
+42.5%
Celeron J4025 539

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.42 0.93
Integrated graphics card 0.77 0.87
Recency 30 August 2016 4 November 2019
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2

Celeron J3455 has a 52.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron J4025, on the other hand, has 13% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 3 years.

The Celeron J3455 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4025 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3455 and Celeron J4025, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3455
Celeron J3455
Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 229 votes

Rate Celeron J3455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 129 votes

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3455 or Celeron J4025, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.