Opteron 842 vs Celeron J3355

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2647not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency7.10no data
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)June 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data193 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)8
SocketFCBGA1296940
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency700 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes6no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 85 Watt

Celeron J3355 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 750% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron J3355 is a desktop processor while Opteron 842 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3355
Celeron J3355
AMD Opteron 842
Opteron 842

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 58 votes

Rate Celeron J3355 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 56 votes

Rate Opteron 842 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3355 or Opteron 842, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.