EPYC 9745 vs Celeron J3160

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3160 and EPYC 9745 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2603not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency12.62no data
Architecture codenameAirmont (2016)Turin (2024)
Release date15 January 2016 (8 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$12,141

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3160 and EPYC 9745 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)128
Threads4256
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.24 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeIDIno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3160 and EPYC 9745 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA1170SP5
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3160 and EPYC 9745. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron J3160 and EPYC 9745 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3160 and EPYC 9745 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3160 and EPYC 9745. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency700 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3160 and EPYC 9745 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3160 and EPYC 9745 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3160 and EPYC 9745.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes4128
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports5no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 January 2016 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 128
Threads 4 256
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 400 Watt

Celeron J3160 has 6566.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9745, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J3160 and EPYC 9745. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron J3160 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9745 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3160 and EPYC 9745, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3160
Celeron J3160
AMD EPYC 9745
EPYC 9745

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 55 votes

Rate Celeron J3160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9745 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3160 or EPYC 9745, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.