Atom Z530 vs Celeron J3160

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3160 and Atom Z530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2601not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Atom
Power efficiency12.54no data
Architecture codenameAirmont (2016)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date15 January 2016 (8 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$95

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3160 and Atom Z530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.24 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeIDIFSB
Bus rateno data533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cacheno data56 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data24.18 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.75 -1.1V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3160 and Atom Z530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170PBGA441
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3160 and Atom Z530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response-no data
Demand Based Switchingno data+
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
FSB parityno data-
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J3160 and Atom Z530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3160 and Atom Z530 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3160 and Atom Z530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Max video memory8 GB-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency700 MHz-
Execution Units12-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3160 and Atom Z530 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3160 and Atom Z530 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+-
OpenGL+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3160 and Atom Z530.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports5no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J3160 1269
+593%
Atom Z530 183

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 January 2016 2 April 2008
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 2 Watt

Celeron J3160 has an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Atom Z530, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J3160 and Atom Z530. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron J3160 is a desktop processor while Atom Z530 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3160 and Atom Z530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3160
Celeron J3160
Intel Atom Z530
Atom Z530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 55 votes

Rate Celeron J3160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 10 votes

Rate Atom Z530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3160 or Atom Z530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.