Processor 300 vs Celeron J3060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Celeron J3060 Celeron J3160 Celeron J3355 Celeron J3455 Celeron J3455E Celeron J4005 Celeron J4025 Celeron J4105 Celeron J4115 Celeron J4125
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core i3-13100 Core i3-13100F Core i5-13400 Core i5-13400F Core i5-13500 Core i5-13500T Core i5-13600 Core i7-13700 Core i7-13700F Core i9-13900 Core i9-13900F Core i9-13900KS

Contents

Celeron J3060 Celeron J3060
Processor 300 Processor 300

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3060 and Processor 300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1307
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiencyno data9.28
Architecture codenameAirmont (2016)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date15 January 2016 (8 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$82

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3060 and Processor 300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.48 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeIDIno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data163 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3060 and Processor 300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3060 and Processor 300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron J3060 and Processor 300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3060 and Processor 300 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3060 and Processor 300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 710
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency700 MHz1.45 GHz
Execution Units1216

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3060 and Processor 300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J3060 and Processor 300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3060 and Processor 300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+12
OpenGL+4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3060 and Processor 300.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes416
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports5no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J3060 679
Processor 300 7160
+954%

Pros & cons summary

Recency 15 January 2016 8 January 2024
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 46 Watt

Celeron J3060 has 666.7% lower power consumption.

Processor 300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J3060 and Processor 300. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3060 and Processor 300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Celeron J3060
Celeron J3060
Intel Processor 300
Processor 300
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Celeron J3060 Celeron J3060
vs
Core 2 Quad Q9400s Core 2 Quad Q9400s
Processor 300 Processor 300
vs
i7-990X Core i7 990X
Celeron J3060 Celeron J3060
vs
Phenom II X4 955 (125W) Phenom II X4 955 (125W)
Xeon W-3275M Xeon W 3275M
vs
Processor 300 Processor 300
Athlon MP 1500+ Athlon MP 1500+
vs
Processor 300 Processor 300
Athlon MP 2400+ Athlon MP 2400+
vs
Processor 300 Processor 300
Athlon MP 2600+ Athlon MP 2600+
vs
Processor 300 Processor 300
EPYC Embedded 3401 EPYC Embedded 3401
vs
Processor 300 Processor 300
Celeron J3160 Celeron J3160
vs
Processor 300 Processor 300
i7-6950X Extreme Edition Core i7 6950X Extreme Edition
vs
Processor 300 Processor 300
i7-965 Extreme Edition Core i7 965 Extreme Edition
vs
Processor 300 Processor 300
i7-980X Extreme Edition Core i7 980X Extreme Edition
vs
Processor 300 Processor 300
i7-990X Extreme Edition Core i7 990X Extreme Edition
vs
Processor 300 Processor 300

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

2.3 135 votes

Rate Celeron J3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 23 votes

Rate Processor 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3060 or Processor 300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.