Celeron N3010 vs J3060

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J3060
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.43
+13.2%
Celeron N3010
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.38

Celeron J3060 outperforms Celeron N3010 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3060 and Celeron N3010 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29613012
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Power efficiency6.788.99
Architecture codenameAirmont (2016)Airmont (2016)
Release date15 January 2016 (8 years ago)10 January 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3060 and Celeron N3010 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.04 GHz
Boost clock speed2.48 GHz2.24 GHz
Bus typeIDIIDI
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3060 and Celeron N3010 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3060 and Celeron N3010. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response--
GPIO++
Smart Connect--
HD Audio++
RST--

Security technologies

Celeron J3060 and Celeron N3010 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Boot++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection++
OS Guard--
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3060 and Celeron N3010 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
VT-i--
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3060 and Celeron N3010. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Max video memory8 GB8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency700 MHz600 MHz
Execution Units1212
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3060 and Celeron N3010 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3060 and Celeron N3010 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX++
OpenGL++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3060 and Celeron N3010.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes44
USB revision2.0/3.02.0/3.0
Total number of SATA ports52
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports22
Number of USB ports55
Integrated LAN--
UART++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J3060 0.43
+13.2%
Celeron N3010 0.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J3060 679
+12.2%
Celeron N3010 605

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J3060 182
Celeron N3010 182

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J3060 320
Celeron N3010 328
+2.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.43 0.38
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 4 Watt

Celeron J3060 has a 13.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron N3010, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

The Celeron J3060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3010 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J3060 is a desktop processor while Celeron N3010 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3060 and Celeron N3010, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3060
Celeron J3060
Intel Celeron N3010
Celeron N3010

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 135 votes

Rate Celeron J3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 24 votes

Rate Celeron N3010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3060 or Celeron N3010, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.