Atom Z560 vs Celeron J3060

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3060 and Atom Z560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2979not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Atom
Power efficiency6.78no data
Architecture codenameAirmont (2016)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date15 January 2016 (8 years ago)1 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3060 and Atom Z560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed2.48 GHz0.13 GHz
Bus typeIDIFSB
Bus rateno data533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data16
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data26 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data47 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.75V-1.1V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3060 and Atom Z560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170PBGA441
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3060 and Atom Z560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response-no data
Demand Based Switchingno data+
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
FSB parityno data-
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J3060 and Atom Z560 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3060 and Atom Z560 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3060 and Atom Z560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600unknown
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Max video memory8 GB-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency700 MHz-
Execution Units12-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3060 and Atom Z560 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3060 and Atom Z560 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+-
OpenGL+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3060 and Atom Z560.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports5no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 January 2016 1 June 2010
Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 2 Watt

Celeron J3060 has an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Atom Z560, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J3060 and Atom Z560. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron J3060 is a desktop processor while Atom Z560 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3060 and Atom Z560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3060
Celeron J3060
Intel Atom Z560
Atom Z560

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 135 votes

Rate Celeron J3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Atom Z560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3060 or Atom Z560, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.