Ryzen 3 3250U vs Celeron J1900

Place in the ranking	2678	1770
Place by popularity	not in top-100	96
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	AMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency	6.81	15.14
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date	1 November 2013 (11 years ago)	6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$82	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 3 3250U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	2 GHz	2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.42 GHz	3.5 GHz
Multiplier	no data	26
L1 cache	224 KB	128K (per core)
L2 cache	2 MB	512K (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB L2 Cache	4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	12 nm
Die size	no data	246 mm²
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	95 °C
Number of transistors	no data	4500 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 3 3250U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCBGA1170	FP5
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 3 3250U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI	-	+
FMA	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
PAE	36 Bit	no data
FDI	-	no data
RST	-	no data
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Security technologies

Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 3 3250U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB	+	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 3 3250U are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 3 3250U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4
Maximum memory size	8 GB	32 GB
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series	AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Graphics max frequency	854 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 3 3250U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 3 3250U.

PCIe version	2.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	4	12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1900 0.72

Ryzen 3 3250U 2.40
+233%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1900 1151

Ryzen 3 3250U 3805
+231%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J1900 173

Ryzen 3 3250U 749
+333%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J1900 515

Ryzen 3 3250U 1456
+183%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.72	2.40
Integrated graphics card	0.77	2.98
Recency	1 November 2013	6 January 2020
Physical cores	4	2
Chip lithography	22 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	15 Watt

Celeron J1900 has 100% more physical cores, and 50% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 3250U, on the other hand, has a 233.3% higher aggregate performance score, 287% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 83.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 3250U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1900 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 3 3250U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.