Celeron N2910 vs J1900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1900 and Celeron N2910 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2677not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Power efficiency6.87no data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)11 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$82no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1900 and Celeron N2910 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.42 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache224 KB56K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1900 and Celeron N2910 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron N2910. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
PAE36 Bitno data
Smart Connectno data+
FDI-no data
RST--

Security technologies

Celeron J1900 and Celeron N2910 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron N2910 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron N2910. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB8.79 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency854 MHz756 MHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1900 and Celeron N2910 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron N2910.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes44
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1900 1151
+47.9%
Celeron N2910 778

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 11 September 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 7 Watt

Celeron J1900 has an age advantage of 1 month.

Celeron N2910, on the other hand, has 42.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1900 and Celeron N2910. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1900 and Celeron N2910, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900
Intel Celeron N2910
Celeron N2910

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 195 votes

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 10 votes

Rate Celeron N2910 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1900 or Celeron N2910, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.