Celeron G5900 vs J1900

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J1900
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.74
Celeron G5900
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 58 Watt
1.70
+130%

Celeron G5900 outperforms Celeron J1900 by a whopping 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1900 and Celeron G5900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26772061
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency6.872.72
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$82no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1900 and Celeron G5900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.42 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache224 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1900 and Celeron G5900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt58 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron G5900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI-no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1900 and Celeron G5900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron G5900 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron G5900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data41.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel UHD Graphics 610
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency854 MHz1.05 GHz
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1900 and Celeron G5900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron G5900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron G5900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron G5900.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1900 0.74
Celeron G5900 1.70
+130%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1900 1151
Celeron G5900 2643
+130%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J1900 173
Celeron G5900 663
+283%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J1900 515
Celeron G5900 1045
+103%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 1.70
Recency 1 November 2013 30 April 2020
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 58 Watt

Celeron J1900 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 480% lower power consumption.

Celeron G5900, on the other hand, has a 129.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron G5900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1900 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron J1900 is a notebook processor while Celeron G5900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1900 and Celeron G5900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900
Intel Celeron G5900
Celeron G5900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 195 votes

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 77 votes

Rate Celeron G5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1900 or Celeron G5900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.