Atom x7433RE vs Celeron J1900

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J1900
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.72
Atom x7433RE
2024
4 cores / 4 threads, 9 Watt
2.64
+267%

Atom x7433RE outperforms Celeron J1900 by a whopping 267% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1900 and Atom x7433RE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26971727
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency6.8127.76
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Amston Lake (2024)
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$82$63

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1900 and Atom x7433RE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.42 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache224 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1900 and Atom x7433RE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and Atom x7433RE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1900 and Atom x7433RE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and Atom x7433RE are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and Atom x7433RE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel UHD Graphics 32EU
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency854 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1900 and Atom x7433RE integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and Atom x7433RE.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes49

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1900 0.72
Atom x7433RE 2.64
+267%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1900 1149
Atom x7433RE 4194
+265%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 2.64
Recency 1 November 2013 8 April 2024
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 9 Watt

Atom x7433RE has a 266.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

The Atom x7433RE is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1900 and Atom x7433RE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900
Intel Atom x7433RE
Atom x7433RE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 196 votes

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x7433RE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1900 or Atom x7433RE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.