Atom E645C vs Celeron J1900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1900 and Atom E645C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2678not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency6.81no data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Stellarton (2010)
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)22 November 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$82no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1900 and Atom E645C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.42 GHz1 GHz
L1 cache224 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data26 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data47 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1900 and Atom E645C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170Intel BGA1466
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and Atom E645C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1900 and Atom E645C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and Atom E645C are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and Atom E645C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel GMA 600
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency854 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1900 and Atom E645C integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and Atom E645C.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 22 November 2010
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 4 Watt

Celeron J1900 has an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

Atom E645C, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1900 and Atom E645C. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1900 and Atom E645C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900
Intel Atom E645C
Atom E645C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 196 votes

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom E645C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1900 or Atom E645C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.