N100 vs Celeron J1850

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J1850
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.62

N100 outperforms Celeron J1850 by a whopping 481% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1850 and N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27911531
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency5.6554.71
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)no data
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$82no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1850 and N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads44
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache224 KBno data
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1850 and N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1850 and N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Thermal Monitoring-+
PAE36 Bitno data
GPIOno data+
FDI-no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1850 and N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1850 and N100 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1850 and N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channels21

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency792 MHz750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data24

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1850 and N100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J1850 and N100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J1850 and N100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1850 and N100.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes49
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1850 0.62
N100 3.60
+481%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1850 942
N100 5504
+484%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.62 3.60
Recency 1 September 2013 1 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 6 Watt

N100 has a 480.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1850 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1850 and N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1850
Celeron J1850
Intel N100
N100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 11 votes

Rate Celeron J1850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 171 vote

Rate N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1850 or N100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.