Atom D2500 vs Celeron J1850

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1850 and Atom D2500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2797not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Atom
Power efficiency5.58no data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Cedarview (2011−2012)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)1 November 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$82no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1850 and Atom D2500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.87 GHz
L1 cache224 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data66 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1850 and Atom D2500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1850 and Atom D2500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAE36 Bit36 Bit
FDI-no data
AMTno data-
HD Audiono data+
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1850 and Atom D2500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1850 and Atom D2500 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1850 and Atom D2500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel GMA
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1850 and Atom D2500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1850 and Atom D2500.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes44
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1850 942
+291%
Atom D2500 241

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2013 1 November 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm

Celeron J1850 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1850 and Atom D2500. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1850 and Atom D2500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1850
Celeron J1850
Intel Atom D2500
Atom D2500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 11 votes

Rate Celeron J1850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 36 votes

Rate Atom D2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1850 or Atom D2500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.