EPYC 7H12 vs Celeron J1800

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1800 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	46
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	Intel Celeron	AMD EPYC
Power efficiency	no data	14.82
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date	1 November 2013 (11 years ago)	18 September 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$72	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1800 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads	2	128
Base clock speed	2.41 GHz	2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.58 GHz	3.3 GHz
Multiplier	no data	26
L1 cache	112 KB	96K (per core)
L2 cache	1 MB	512K (per core)
L3 cache	1 MB L2 Cache	256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	7 nm, 14 nm
Die size	no data	192 mm2
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	4,800 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1800 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	2 (Multiprocessor)
Socket	FCBGA1170	TR4
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1800 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
PAE	36 Bit	no data
FDI	-	no data
RST	-	no data
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Security technologies

Celeron J1800 and EPYC 7H12 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB	+	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1800 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1800 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size	8 GB	4 TiB
Max memory channels	2	8
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support	-	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series	no data
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Graphics max frequency	792 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1800 and EPYC 7H12 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1800 and EPYC 7H12.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	4	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 November 2013	18 September 2019
Physical cores	2	64
Threads	2	128
Chip lithography	22 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	280 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1800 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---