Celeron 4205U vs J1800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J1800
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.36
Celeron 4205U
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.86
+139%

Celeron 4205U outperforms Celeron J1800 by a whopping 139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1800 and Celeron 4205U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30502571
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Power efficiency3.405.42
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)23 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72$107

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1800 and Celeron 4205U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.41 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.58 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataOPI
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
Multiplierno data18
L1 cache112 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1800 and Celeron 4205U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170Intel BGA 1528
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron 4205U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1800 and Celeron 4205U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron 4205U are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron 4205U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel HD Graphics 610 (300 - 900 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1800 and Celeron 4205U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron 4205U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes412

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1800 0.36
Celeron 4205U 0.86
+139%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1800 574
Celeron 4205U 1367
+138%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 0.86
Integrated graphics card 0.77 1.85
Recency 1 November 2013 23 January 2019
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron J1800 has 50% lower power consumption.

Celeron 4205U, on the other hand, has a 138.9% higher aggregate performance score, 140.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron 4205U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1800 and Celeron 4205U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800
Intel Celeron 4205U
Celeron 4205U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 539 votes

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 130 votes

Rate Celeron 4205U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1800 or Celeron 4205U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.