Ryzen Threadripper 1955 vs Celeron J1750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1750 and Ryzen Threadripper 1955 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1750 and Ryzen Threadripper 1955 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads2no data
Base clock speed2.41 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.41 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache112 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache32768 KB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1750 and Ryzen Threadripper 1955 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1750 and Ryzen Threadripper 1955. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1750 and Ryzen Threadripper 1955 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1750 and Ryzen Threadripper 1955 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1750 and Ryzen Threadripper 1955. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1750 and Ryzen Threadripper 1955 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1750 and Ryzen Threadripper 1955.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 10
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron J1750 has 1150% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 1955, on the other hand, has 400% more physical cores, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1750 and Ryzen Threadripper 1955. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron J1750 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1955 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1750 and Ryzen Threadripper 1955, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1750
Celeron J1750
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1955
Ryzen Threadripper 1955

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Celeron J1750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1955 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1750 or Ryzen Threadripper 1955, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.