Celeron J1800 vs J1750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J1750
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.37
+2.8%
Celeron J1800
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.36

Celeron J1750 outperforms Celeron J1800 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1750 and Celeron J1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30353051
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Power efficiency3.483.39
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72$72

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1750 and Celeron J1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.41 GHz2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed2.41 GHz2.58 GHz
L1 cache112 KB112 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1750 and Celeron J1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1750 and Celeron J1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
PAE36 Bit36 Bit
FDI--
RST--

Security technologies

Celeron J1750 and Celeron J1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1750 and Celeron J1800 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1750 and Celeron J1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency750 MHz792 MHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1750 and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1750 and Celeron J1800.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes44

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1750 0.37
+2.8%
Celeron J1800 0.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1750 595
+3.8%
Celeron J1800 573

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.37 0.36
Recency 1 September 2013 1 November 2013

Celeron J1750 has a 2.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron J1800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron J1750 and Celeron J1800.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1750 and Celeron J1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1750
Celeron J1750
Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Celeron J1750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 538 votes

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1750 or Celeron J1800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.