EPYC 9135 vs Celeron G6900TE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G6900TE
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.49
EPYC 9135
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
36.56
+2354%

EPYC 9135 outperforms Celeron G6900TE by a whopping 2354% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G6900TE and EPYC 9135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking215996
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.26
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency4.0317.29
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-S (2022)Turin (2024)
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G6900TE and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data2x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistorsno data16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G6900TE and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket1700SP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G6900TE and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron G6900TE and EPYC 9135 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G6900TE and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G6900TE and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 710N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G6900TE and EPYC 9135.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G6900TE 1.49
EPYC 9135 36.56
+2354%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G6900TE 2373
EPYC 9135 58070
+2347%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.49 36.56
Recency 4 January 2022 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 200 Watt

Celeron G6900TE has 471.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9135, on the other hand, has a 2353.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9135 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G6900TE in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G6900TE is a desktop processor while EPYC 9135 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G6900TE and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G6900TE
Celeron G6900TE
AMD EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 9 votes

Rate Celeron G6900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G6900TE or EPYC 9135, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.